• To: 'XML DEV' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 21:04:53 -0500
• In-reply-to: <008701c3eabe$a8e98d30$0301a8c0@IRENE>
• References: <008701c3eabe$a8e98d30$0301a8c0@IRENE>

On Feb 3, 2004, at 8:31 PM, Irene Polikoff wrote:

> . I'd like to hear your opinion on RSS
> 1.0. Does it have as much adoption as RSS 2.0? Does it have the same
> short comings as RSS 2.0?

Ask me about religion, politics, cosmology, epistemology, or any other 
subject that people have fought and died for over the centuries, but 
please not about the merits of one flavor of RSS vs another.  It's just 
too inflammatory :-)    Suffice it say that everything about your 
question is bitterly controversial -- how to measure adoption, how to 
define shortcomings, etc. etc. etc.

>
> Is it just RSS 2.0 that is frozen or is RSS 1.0 frozen as well?

As I interpret http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/process, everything 
associated with RSS 1.x is open to modification, but I'm not part of 
that community and I don't really know.

• References:
  • RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
    • From: "Irene Polikoff" <Irene@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Next by Date: Re: Expertise and Innovation - was Re: Non-Borgservers can authenticate Borg clients (Was Re: Re: Cookies atXML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation)
• Previous by thread: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Next by thread: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread