• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: semantics in schema (xsd)
• From: Pedro Salazar <pedro-b-salazar@p...>
• Date: 26 Feb 2004 11:46:21 +0000
• In-reply-to: <20040226095808.MPLV21785.mta08-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>
• Organization: Portugal Telecom Inovação, S.A.
• References: <20040226095808.MPLV21785.mta08-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle>

Hi, 

by reading your comments it appears that schema doesn't allow to
implement more advanced semantic validations like attribute values
dependencies. You referred also another frameworks to do it such as RDF
(Resource Description Framework), OWL (?), schematron, ... and others.

Unfortunately, I cannot use them because I intend to use data binding
(I'm thinking using castor), and my only option would be schemas to make
that interface and the "dirty laundry". Is there any data binding to
work with those frameworks?   

I believe that I will use those technologies in future if they are so
more powerful than schemas, but for now I must limit my developments to
xml parsers and data bindings.

Now, I must thank you all for your help.  

Pedro Salazar.
-- 
-PS

• References:
  • RE: semantics in schema (xsd)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A FreeXUL Spec
• Next by Date: Re: A Rich Internet For Everyone - Let's Create A Free XULSpec
• Previous by thread: RE: semantics in schema (xsd)
• Next by thread: RE: semantics in schema (xsd)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread