• To: "'Elliotte Rusty Harold'" <elharo@m...>,"'Jeff Rafter'" <lists@j...>
• Subject: RE: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:26:09 -0000
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <p06010208bc600b51567a@[192.168.254.4]>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> The Xerces team just fixed a 
> particularly nasty bug my tests had exposed:

If we've got to the point where serial reuse of a parser instance
results in poor error reporting with malformed documents, and this is
considered a "particularly nasty bug", then I think we're winning.

Michael Kay

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: equivalence of <i><b></b></i> and <b><i></i></b> et. al. ?
• Next by Date: RE: help XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• Next by thread: RE: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread