• To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@m...>
• Subject: Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:41:05 -0800
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <000a01c3fa15$e92cf240$6401a8c0@pcukmka> <p06010204bc5fc3f692c5@[192.168.254.4]> <025b01c3fa30$a2b8cc60$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA> <p06010206bc5ff57b3545@[192.168.254.4]>

> My opinion may change as I explore farther, but to date in my tests
> the Saxon fork of AElfred seems significantly superior to GNU JAXP.
> That is a little surprising. I'm not yet convinced I'm not doing
> something wrong when it comes to GNU JAXP that's causing it to fail
> the various tests Saxon's AElfred (and dom4j's AElfred) both pass.

Heh, is your test suite public? Or will it be after your presentation? I
must admit that is a pretty great topic and I would love to be at the
conference though there is little chance of that happening...

Cheers,
Jeff Rafter

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • RE: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • RE: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>
  • Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• Next by Date: Re: SAX Topic 2004-0003: Unicode normalization
• Previous by thread: Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• Next by thread: Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread