• To: 'XML DEV' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: When Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam
• From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:36:27 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F399@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F399@h...>

On Feb 20, 2004, at 9:25 AM, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> Automation just ain't smart enough.  Note reason.
>

Or people ain't smart enough to install decent spam filters, or virus 
scanners that don't spam the random addresses in an infected machines 
address book that are forged in outgoing spam.  The state of the 
automation art is well beyond this.  [I'm still infatuated with 
SpamBayes after a year]

For all we know, this was generated by one of those spam filters 
advertised by spamming :-)

• References:
  • When Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: When Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam
• Next by Date: Local Vs Global Vocabularies ( Was RE: When Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam)
• Previous by thread: When Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam
• Next by thread: Local Vs Global Vocabularies ( Was RE: When Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam Filters Spam)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread