• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: bestpractice for providing newsfeeds ?)
• From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
• Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 13:13:22 -0500
• In-reply-to: <20040203175512.GG2765@s...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1D51847@R...> <401FDD8A.4020102@a...> <20040203175512.GG2765@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1

jcowan@r... wrote:

>>If they do give up NewsML and switch to RSS or Atom, they'll either have to 
>>adjust their rights-management business model drastically, or RSS/Atom will 
>>have to change to accomodate them.
> 
> We do both.

Thanks for the note, John.  Is Reuters Health using RSS/Atom for B2B 
delivery, or just B2C?  B2C is generally the easier problem (as far as 
metadata goes), since end users are not equipped to do much except read the 
news items anyway.


All the best,


David

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?)
    • From: jcowan@r...

• References:
  • RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: best practice forproviding newsfeeds ?)
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
  • Re: Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?)
    • From: jcowan@r...

• Prev by Date: Re: Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?)
• Next by Date: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Previous by thread: Re: Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?)
• Next by thread: Re: Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread