• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: more silly questions
• From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Date: 08 Feb 2004 13:03:33 -0800
• In-reply-to: <20040208144547.48d67218.amyzing@t...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F2CA@h...><20040208144547.48d67218.amyzing@t...>
• Sender: ari@f...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...> writes:

> On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 12:23:48 -0600 
> "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...> wrote:
> 
> [more on how to fix SMTP, following up Michael Kay in response to me]
> 
> is there anything that XML, as a technology, can contribute toward the
> solution?

Yes. Stay away from what works. Until you can show that (a) the data
format is what's broke and (b) what's broke about it is the syntax and
not the underlying abstraction.

> Rick Marshall <rjm@z...> writes:
> 
> > is there an open source effort to create an email schema to replace the
> > current rfc's?

-- 
Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money
betting on the outcome.

• References:
  • RE: more silly questions
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: more silly questions
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: more silly questions
• Next by Date: RE: more silly questions
• Previous by thread: Re: more silly questions
• Next by thread: RE: more silly questions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread