• To: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Subject: Re: XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations
• From: jcowan@r...
• Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 14:26:09 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <402140B4.8060205@o...>
• References: <20040204182024.GL2765@s...> <402140B4.8060205@o...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Bob Foster scripsit:

> >Nattering nabobs of negativism will doubtless be glad to note that XML
> >1.1 parsers MUST support XML 1.0 as well, and that human and mechanical
> >XML generators SHOULD generate XML 1.0 unless there is a specific reason
> >to generate XML 1.1.
> 
> I'd be gladder if you sent me a check for $268,482.

Why, is that your estimate of implementation cost plus 10%?  If so, it's
serious overcharging.

-- 
Yes, chili in the eye is bad, but so is your    John Cowan
ear.  However, I would suggest you wash your    jcowan@r...
hands thoroughly before going to the toilet.    http://www.reutershealth.com
        --gadicath                              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations
    • From: jcowan@r...
  • Re: XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations
• Next by Date: Re: Expertise and Innovation - was Re: Non-Borg servers can authenticate Borg clients (Was Re: Re:Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations
• Next by thread: Re: XML 1.1 and friends are now W3C Recommendations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread