• To: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@p...>
• Subject: Another SAX 1.1 issue (Was: Re: Re: [Sax-devel] SAX -endDocument() confusion again)
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 06:43:16 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., sax-devel@l..., ndw@n...
• In-reply-to: <6.0.0.22.0.20040228115143.0206e8a0@p...>
• References: <001101c3fd64$eab0ad30$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k><p06010205bc656a624668@[192.168.254.4]><6.0.0.22.0.20040228115143.0206e8a0@p...>

At 12:03 PM +0200 2/28/04, Toni Uusitalo wrote:

>I decided not to call startDocument/endDocument-pair when BOM or XML 
>declaration or setting forced encoding fails. Reason for this was I 
>wanted document's actual encoding to be known at the startDocument 
>stage (as there isn't necessarily xml declaration present of course).

I see your point. Hmm, should we adjust Locator2.getEncoding() and 
getXMLVersion() so that they can return null if this information is 
not available?
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@m...
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA

• References:
  • SAX - endDocument() confusion again
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
  • Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again
    • From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX - endDocument() confusion again
• Next by Date: EditiX 1.1 - XML Editor
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again
• Next by thread: Re: Re: [Sax-devel] SAX - endDocument() confusion again
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread