• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Date: 09 Feb 2004 13:01:17 -0800
• In-reply-to: <4027978D.2040701@a...>
• References: <861xp5f4ov.fsf@f...> <4026E5A0.7060209@a...><86bro8etmc.fsf@f...> <4027978D.2040701@a...>
• Sender: ari@f...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

David Megginson <dmeggin@a...> writes:

> K. Ari Krupnikov wrote:
> 
> > Client does presentation, server does business logic. Is that not in
> > line with REST?
> 
> I'll leave it to the RESTafarians to answer that question, but sending
> one big chunk of information is nicely in line with the XML ideal of
> separating information from processing.

It doesn't solve the lost update problem.

Ari.

-- 
Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money
betting on the outcome.

• References:
  • A question about REST and transaction isolation
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
  • Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
  • Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
  • Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>

• Prev by Date: Alternative to MSXML
• Next by Date: RE: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• Previous by thread: Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• Next by thread: Re: A question about REST and transaction isolation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread