• To: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Subject: Re: SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support
• From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:19:59 -0500
• Cc: John Cowan <cowan@c...>, David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>, XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <021001c3f977$b6252d20$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>
• References: <4038BC6D.5040807@a...><01be01c3f95b$e2ec4120$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA> <20040222184150.GM9342@c...><021001c3f977$b6252d20$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

/ "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...> was heard to say:
| Granted this is just a versioning issue-- the moral of which is: don't use
| old filters with newer SAX parsers which support 1.1 because they won't
| work. It makes sense... but I also don't think that the filters as written
| were inherently evil and that their users need to lose-- they just need to
| upgrade everything when upgrading.

Exactly.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@n...> | We cannot put off living until we are
http://nwalsh.com/            | ready. The most salient characteristic
                              | of life is its coerciveness: it is
                              | always urgent, 'here and now' without
                              | any possible postponement. Life is
                              | fired at us point blank.--José Ortega
                              | Y Gasset

PGP signature

• References:
  • SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
  • Re: SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>
  • Re: SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support
• Next by Date: Re: Piccolo Java SAX parser and others in the wild?
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support
• Next by thread: Re: SAX Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread