• To: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>
• Subject: Re: JSR 206 and SAX
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:26:41 -0500
• Cc: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@n...>, <xml-dev@l...>,"David Megginson" <dmeggin@a...>
• In-reply-to: <014f01c3f73a$eb5b7830$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>
• References: <87znbgt3nb.fsf@n...> <40341A54.40806@a...><87n07elu8e.fsf@n...> <p06010203bc5acccee4c1@[192.168.254.4]><014f01c3f73a$eb5b7830$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>

At 2:51 PM -0800 2/19/04, Jeff Rafter wrote:

>I am not sure why the factory level is the most appropriate? Aren't the
>getFeature, setFeature functions part of the XMLReader itself? Why add
>feature maintenance at the factory level when it can simply be enumerated
>through creation of each available XMLReader (if necessary, as it is likely
>known a priori)?

It isn't. You're right. This should be setFeature on the XMLReader. 
There is no setFeature on XMLReaderFactory.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@m...
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: JSR 206 and SAX
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
  • XML 3E and SAX (Re: JSR 206 and SAX)
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>

• References:
  • JSR 206 and SAX
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
  • Re: JSR 206 and SAX
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
  • Re: JSR 206 and SAX
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
  • Re: JSR 206 and SAX
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: JSR 206 and SAX
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: SAX and XML Version (was Re: JSR 206 and SAX)
• Next by Date: Re: XML publishing frameworks and software methodologies
• Previous by thread: Re: JSR 206 and SAX
• Next by thread: XML 3E and SAX (Re: JSR 206 and SAX)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread