• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML
• From: Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz@S...>
• Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:17:41 +0000
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1D518AA@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1D518AA@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314

Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Interesting. Too bad her comment is the equivalent of a sound bite
> with no substance at all. I'd be curious to know why she things
> moving to XML from proprietary binary formats is a setback as opposed
> to a step forward.

> Maybe this is just Sun's way of justifying pushing
> replacing the XML in XML Web Services with ASN.1
> 

None that i know about.

Note, just in case the 'proprietary binary formats' label gets stuck 
erroneously to ASN.1: ASN.1 is not proprietary and nor are the set of 
ASN.1 encoding rules. There are no proprietary binary formats used, or 
any plans to use such formats, in Fast Web Services.

Paul.

-- 
| ? + ? = To question
----------------\
    Paul Sandoz
         x19219
+353-1-8199219

• References:
  • RE: Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: id proxy
• Next by Date: RE: id proxy
• Previous by thread: Re: Benefits of SOAP?
• Next by thread: RE: Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz about XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread