• To: "'joe@r...'" <joe@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Patent Spam (was Re: US Patent 6,687,897)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:55:58 -0600

And I will take you to court in Texas based on the point 
that your original claim for patent spamming was 
contextualized by its use in list fights about patents,
and that your subsequent claims attempted to broaden that to 
include the marketing application, thus invalidating your current 
claim and vacating any ruling made on your prior claim.

Check please?  Or will that be charge?  Our patent claims 
attorney doors are always open to new business!

len

From: Joe Fawcett [mailto:joefawcett@h...]

I'm going to patent spamming as a method of marketing and then start taking 
spammers to court for infringing my patent :)

• Prev by Date: RE: Patent Spam (was Re: US Patent 6,687,897)
• Next by Date: Re: Patent Spam (was Re: US Patent 6,687,897)
• Previous by thread: Re: Patent Spam (was Re: US Patent 6,687,897)
• Next by thread: XInclude
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread