• To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@i...>
• Subject: Re: Fun with regular expressions
• From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>
• Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:38:45 -0800
• Cc: "Micah Dubinko" <MDubinko@c...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• References: <BD2DBD26EE0BAA48B1A425C7BE7923002D08D1@c...><01e701c3eb4f$e77ba650$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA><046401c3ecd3$64b25810$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA> <f5bllngujid.fsf@e...>

>> This is just further proof that you should use the inclusive cases of INF
>> and -INF. This will help your cmopatibility now-- and the will be usable
in
>> the future. Of course, whether or not this makes more sense than using a
>> pattern is still debateable.

I should also add that there is an erratum that clafirfies pattern-- it is
now fixed to the head and tail. So, some of the patterns that were posted in
this thread might be invalid due to the change. (See E2-52 in
http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata)

> And I've updated XSV (the online version and the CVS tree only,
> binaries will have to wait a few days) to implement NaN, INF and -INF.

Thanks Henry, you are the best!

Jeff Rafter

• References:
  • RE: Fun with regular expressions
    • From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@c...>
  • Re: Fun with regular expressions
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>
  • Re: Fun with regular expressions
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks?
• Previous by thread: Re: Fun with regular expressions
• Next by thread: RE: Fun with regular expressions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread