[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Dimitre Novatchev wrote: >>I found such a schema for XSLT 2.0, but not for XSLT 1.0. Even a >>correct-as-far-as-it-goes unofficial one would probably be adequate for my >>needs. > > Such a schema wouldn't be too-useful, as XSLT allows any result nodes and > any global-scope elements (and their descendents) that belong to a non-XSLT > namespace. Yes but why wouldn't it be useful? Such a schema validates what it specifically describes and validates that what it doesn't specifically describe still operates within certain constrains. Beyond validation, I know that editor users are quite happy to have schema-driven assist/completion for XSLT elements and attributes, and even some level of schema-driven assistance can be provided for non-XSLT nodes, though they aren't always even locally valid. Not perfect, but useful. Bob Foster http://xmlbuddy.com/
|

Cart



