• To: rjm@z...
• Subject: Re: reply-to
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 12:51:15 +0100
• Cc: "'xml-dev@l... '" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <1075923978.2623.8.camel@z...>
• References: <1075923978.2623.8.camel@z...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Rick Marshall wrote:
> couldn't we have the reply-to: on this list set to xml-dev etc so that a
> simple reply click will send messages back. sometimes i don't hit reply
> to all, and sometimes i forget to delete all the cc users.

That's a permathread all over the net. Some people prefer it one way, 
others another, and both sides will come up with smart but useless 
arguments to show that the other side's approach is evil.

However, at some point some people got the weird notion that you could 
use computers to store a little information about subscribers, and again 
use computers to send different headers to different people depending on 
that little information. Powerful things these computers! Enter Siesta:

   http://siesta.unixbeard.net/

-- 
Robin Berjon

• References:
  • reply-to
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks?
• Next by Date: [ANN] XMLOpen Conference Reschedules
• Previous by thread: reply-to
• Next by thread: Can A Web Site Be Reliably Defended Against DoS Attacks?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread