• To: bob@w...
• Subject: Re: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
• Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:32:24 -0800
• Cc: "'Joshua Allen'" <joshuaa@m...>, jcowan@r..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <006c01c3ea91$d2602660$650aa8c0@BOBDEV>
• Organization: liveSTORYBOARD
• References: <006c01c3ea91$d2602660$650aa8c0@BOBDEV>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Bob Wyman wrote:

> 	The confusion over the meaning of pubDate is only one of many,
> many problems with RSS as we know it today. In order to address user
> needs, we either need to "fix" RSS or move to something new. Given
> that RSS has been declared "closed" and "never to be amended," we're
> stuck moving to Atom -- *In order to provide our customers the service
> they demand.*

I have been leaning toward RSS 2.0, but this argument sways me to Atom, 
especially if the newsreaders can handle it. I just got off the phone 
with one of the clients that wants newsfeeds. He does not really care 
what type/version -- he feels it is a 'future' thing -- he is apparently 
correct.

What is holding Atom up? Where is in its growth to final (too early <--> 
very close)?

best,
-Rob

> 
> 		bob wyman
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
    • From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Next by Date: Updates (was Re: best practice for providing newsfeeds?)
• Previous by thread: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Next by thread: Re: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread