Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Right. They don't know about namespaces and don't care this season. Over time as IP and conformance to cited standards becomes more important, they will. So the namespace is just the implementation means. The coupler is the features as expressed in the extensions (as denoted by the namespace), and that is life as normal among competing providers of specification-based products. As I thought, technology push vs customer pull. The fun is that for some technologies, as you note, the technologists are the customers. Note that the namespacesAreEvil thread is stable; no matter how perturbed, it returns to the same predictable points on the topic map. It would be fun to have a technology that extracted such topic points from perma-threads, mapped them, then visualized them such that one could see if they are stable, non-linear chaotic, and what if any strange attractors emerge, then what the nature of these are. len From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@m...] If your customers are XML geeks I'd expect not. If your customers are reqular people who just want software to work then they are just an implementation detail.
|
