• Subject: Re: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
• Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 09:19:53 -0800
• Cc: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F26D@h...>
• Organization: liveSTORYBOARD
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F26D@h...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

 > So the customer isn't pulling.  They are stumbling
 > and grabbing onto the nearest thing to right themselves.
 > Not surprising.
 >
 > Do the editors come with online help, as in bubble help
 > or something?

Sure, but I will be using the 'publish' date (when the perma linked html 
file is generated) rather than the created or modified (corrections can 
occur but chronological order is preserved). The user won't see this or 
need to edit it.

If there are things like modDate or creationDate added to a future spec, 
those can be included then, because they are stored in the CMS project's 
metadata.

-Rob

• References:
  • RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Next by Date: Syndication, dates, and DRM (was Re: best practice forproviding newsfeeds ?)
• Previous by thread: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Next by thread: RE: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread