• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: Schema evolution as Genus and Species (Re: Schema evolution)
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:36:03 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <400E0842.3070902@a...>
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0401192313210.16325-100000@s...> <400E0842.3070902@a...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

> Here is one way to do it in Schematron,
> treating it as a problem of separating constraints into those of
> genus (open, extensible) and those of species (closed).

Awesome; the terminology along makes it worth the trip.

	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • Schema evolution
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • Schema evolution as Genus and Species (Re: Schema evolution)
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XSD-based standards using abstract elements?
• Next by Date: RE: Multiple HTML files
• Previous by thread: Schema evolution as Genus and Species (Re: Schema evolution)
• Next by thread: Genx
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread