• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Postel's law, exceptions
• From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:28:20 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <4006E879.8010701@d...>

> He goes a bit overboard, but Mark Pilgrim makes some good points:
>     http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/01/14/thought_experiment
> (What, Mark going overboard?  I'm shocked I say, shocked.)  Don't lose
> his point: it's not necessarily invalid markup, but different character
> encodings, too.

He makes some very dubious points to. This is a true story, except it didn't
happen ;-)

Various responses:
http://icite.net/blog/200401/xml_exterminator.html

Cheers,
Danny.

• References:
  • Re: Postel's law, exceptions
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Postel's law, exceptions
• Next by Date: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• Previous by thread: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• Next by thread: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread