• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:15:44 -0500
• In-reply-to: <F2368291-437C-11D8-A4BC-000A95BA5A2C@o...>

jonathan@o... (Jonathan Borden) writes:
>I am entirely missing the logic behind wanting to allow a fragid in a 
>base URI.

Hmmm.... I'm a really lazy typist creating links to a collection of
documents with a shared base URI.  I have to create a lot of links to a
document at the base ID, and in fact to a particular fragid-identified
location in that document.  Since I don't want to type the fragid
repeatedly, I drop it in the base URI and type a lot of <a href="">.

That's the only thing I can think of, and I'm not sure it would work
reliably anyway. 

Maybe someone has something more convincing?

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• References:
  • Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• Next by Date: Re: Non-Borg servers can authenticate Borg clients (Was Re: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation)
• Previous by thread: Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• Next by thread: Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread