• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Invalid attribute names
• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 17:16:37 GMT
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <200401011706.i01H6QSQ019116@a...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

>%rxp -N < test.xml
>Warning: Attribute name :b has empty prefix
>in unnamed entity at line 1 char 6 of <stdin>
>Warning: Attribute name :b has unbound prefix
>in unnamed entity at line 1 char 12 of <stdin>
><a :b="c"/>
>%echo $?
>0
>
>(result code 0 means the document is well-formed)

The latest version of RXP reports:

Error: Attribute name :b has empty prefix
 in unnamed entity at line 1 char 6 of <stdin>

and returns status 1.

This corresponds to the namespaces erratum defining the term
"namespace well-formedness".  The original version of the spec did
not specify a kind of error that should be reported.

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Invalid attribute names
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Invalid attribute names
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Invalid attribute names
• Next by Date: Re: Invalid attribute names
• Previous by thread: Re: Invalid attribute names
• Next by thread: Re: Invalid attribute names
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread