• To: tbray@t...
• Subject: Re: Genx c14n?
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:48:39 -0500
• Cc: XML Developer List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <p06010212bc3b1230b527@[192.168.254.4]>
• References: <5EE49890-5029-11D8-A716-000A95A51C9E@t...><p06010212bc3b1230b527@[192.168.254.4]>

At 1:55 PM -0500 1/26/04, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

>I think the obvious solution is to add a function that turns 
>canonicalization on or off, with the default being on.

Hmm, that was a thinko. The default should be off. Do not produce 
canonical XML unless specifically requested to.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@m...
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Genx c14n?
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• References:
  • Genx c14n?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Genx c14n?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Genx c14n?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Genx c14n?
• Previous by thread: Re: Genx c14n?
• Next by thread: Re: Genx c14n?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread