• To: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
• Subject: Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:56:25 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200401250024.i0P0O2NK093024@a...>
• References: <200401250024.i0P0O2NK093024@a...>

On Jan 24, 2004, at 4:24 PM, David Tolpin wrote:

> The sad thing is that no C compiler is able to enforce 
> const-correctness
> consistently; they are only good as comments, and as such, I prefer
> comments over keywords. This keyword gets in the way and forces to
> cast types; it never helps.

Hah!  I didn't know that, but I suspected that it couldn't actually be 
useful. Thank you.  -Tim

smime.p7s

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans
• Next by Date: Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans
• Previous by thread: Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans
• Next by thread: Re: Refreshed genx.h, plus some plans
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread