• To: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Subject: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:30:17 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200401140201.i0E21to01550@d...>
• References: <40048CA2.2070609@g...> <r02000200-1028-D1176A3A460611D8AD220003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]><5B1A714A-461A-11D8-8ADE-000A95CCC59E@x...><200401140201.i0E21to01550@d...>

At 6:01 PM -0800 1/13/04, Joe English wrote:

>In fact any aggregator that doesn't do something like this
>is doomed to fail -- *nobody's* feed has the encoding labelled
>properly.  (Well, maybe not "nobody", but certainly not very many.)


Certainly not nobody. My feeds are strictly always well-formed. 
They're produced by using XSLT to transform hand-authored XHTML, and 
if the XHTML is malformed that day, no feed document is produced, and 
I get an e-mail pinging me with the error. If well-formedness is 
demanded, tools will support it.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@m...
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA

• References:
  • Re: Postel's law, exceptions
    • From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
  • Postel's law, exceptions
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Postel's law, exceptions
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Postel's law, exceptions
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: [ANN] Relaxer 1.0
• Next by Date: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• Previous by thread: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• Next by thread: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread