• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Noise-free Complex Systems
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:36:11 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F12C@h...>

clbullar@i... (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>This is related to Berners-Lee's recent 
>post to the TAG list on the requirement 
>for equality of 'chunks' of XML regardless 
>of the system component handling the 
>chunk.  

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Jan/0013.html

>In other words, what is needed 
>for any XML part or whole to remain 
>invariant across any current or future 
>WWW system (the WWW is a system of 
>systems)?

I'm not sure I have any sympathy for this problem.  It seems like the
people who've tried hardest to push the world to an infoset-centric view
of XML are now finding that even that isn't consistent enough for their
needs.

I think they'd do well to find a data representation solution that
actually meets their needs rather than trying to nail XML to a wall.
It's not going to stick.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Noise-free Complex Systems
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: Noise-free Complex Systems
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• References:
  • Noise-free Complex Systems
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Noise-free Complex Systems
• Next by Date: Re: Noise-free Complex Systems
• Previous by thread: Noise-free Complex Systems
• Next by thread: Re: Noise-free Complex Systems
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread