• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Patents, schmatents (was: hi)
• From: "Scott Parnell" <scottp12@r...>
• Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:57:03 -0500
• References: <008e01c3e796$f3938d70$650aa8c0@BOBDEV>

Anyone remember BountyQuest?
http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/ask_tim/2003/bountyquest_1003.html

Scott

Bob Wyman <bob@w...> wrote:

> 2. Virtually no one takes advantage of the 60 day window after
> a patent application is published to challenge the patent by
> submitting prior art. If we were rational, what we'd have is people
> posting notes about suspect new patent applications the moment they
> are published and then discussion of prior art on lists like this one.
> (Immediately, hundreds of "ignorance is bliss" types said: "Oh, No!".)
> Nonetheless, the public review period is there but is virtually
> ignored.

• References:
  • RE: Patents, schmatents (was: hi)
    • From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Schema fragments for everyday stuff
• Next by Date: Re: Schema fragments for everyday stuff
• Previous by thread: RE: Patents, schmatents (was: hi)
• Next by thread: best practice for providing newsfeeds ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread