• To: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• Subject: Re: genx - genxEndTag
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:39:44 -0800
• Cc: "xml-dev mailing list" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <012e01c3e102$add09ca0$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>
• References: <0806139A-4C8A-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@t...> <007901c3e0f7$7d81fa40$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k> <012e01c3e102$add09ca0$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>

On Jan 22, 2004, at 8:13 AM, Karl Waclawek wrote:

> Now genxEndTag does not have name/prefix/uri arguments, which
> it does not need to, as you just write out the next name
> popped from your internal stack.

Right, and if you call 'EndDocument' but there are still tags on the 
stack, that's
an error.  So...

> It also makes it harder to write valid XML, since a misplaced
> genxEndTag will not normally lead to malformed XML which
> could be detected, but it will change the structure in an
> un-intentioned way.

Probably not in this case. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: genx - genxEndTag
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• References:
  • genx - consensus items
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: genx - consensus items
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
  • Re: genx - genxEndTag
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• Prev by Date: sane XML
• Next by Date: Re: genx - consensus items
• Previous by thread: Re: genx - genxEndTag
• Next by thread: Re: genx - genxEndTag
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread