• To: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Particip ation
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:10:38 -0500
• Cc: XML-DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <3FFAEABB.4060607@d...>
• References: <p06010207bc2091af5cae@[192.168.254.4]><3FFAEABB.4060607@d...>

At 12:04 PM -0500 1/6/04, Rich Salz wrote:

>I read it.  It appears that good security practices conflict with 
>REST.  It's nice to hear the RESTafarians admit it.

Possibly you read a message I missed or interpreted it differently. 
Could you please provide the URL to and quote from the specific 
message which demonstrates that good security practices conflict with 
REST?
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@m...
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Particip ation
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • Re: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Particip ation
    • From: Michael Champion <mc@x...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Particip ation
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Particip ation
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Participation
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call for Particip ation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread