• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 12:45:08 -0500
• In-reply-to: <20040122171439.GE9212@s...>

jcowan@r... writes:
>Hypertext is a particular application of linking, a more basic notion.
>It's a mistake to think of links solely in the hypertext context.

I don't think that changes the argument about the value of generic
linking at all.  To put it bluntly, "one linking mechanism to rule them
all" is ridiculous on its face.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• References:
  • Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
    • From: jcowan@r...

• Prev by Date: Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Next by Date: Fruitbasket schema question for both W3C/RelaxNG
• Previous by thread: Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Next by thread: Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread