• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Postel's law, exceptions
• From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:53:11 +1100
• In-reply-to: <200401210705.AOD50942@m...>
• References: <200401210705.AOD50942@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030428

Bob Wyman wrote:

>    In other mail, it has been pointed out that the ISO 
>language codes include "mul" (multiple) and "und" 
>(undetermined). Thus, what I was suggesting in my earlier 
>note (new tags i-unknown and i-mixed) is unnecessary. 
>
I believe that W3C I18n WG is also clarifying undeclaration of language
using xml:lang="", which is a much more elegant default than  "und".
(It falls outside the RFC 3066 scope, being the meaning of the absense of
a code rather than a code.)

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • RE: Postel's law, exceptions
    • From: Bob Wyman <bob@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Postel's law, exceptions
• Next by Date: Re: re: genx
• Previous by thread: RE: Postel's law, exceptions
• Next by thread: RE: Postel's law, exceptions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread