• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: wacky XML
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 09:32:54 -0500
• In-reply-to: <CA32291A48597E49B25211A09052F3FA018C9D6A@f...>
• References: <CA32291A48597E49B25211A09052F3FA018C9D6A@f...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Strolia-Davis Christopher Contr MSG/MAT wrote:

> Jeff Rafter wrote:
> 
>>Maybe practical maybe not, but I use XML to translate programming
>>languages...
> 
> 
> Cool deal.  I've often thought that this technology could really lend itself
> to translating programming languages.  I've also considered the possibility
> that you could use it to make a pretty wild IDE that would allow comments
> and formatting to be applied to code more easily than they are now.
> 

You should look at Leo, the literate programming tool, which is really 
very nice.  It uses xml for its native file format.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • RE: wacky XML
    • From: Strolia-Davis Christopher Contr MSG/MAT <Christopher.Strolia-Davis@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Cookies at XML Europe 2004 -- Call forParticipation
• Next by Date: RE: Another mutated variant of the 'PowerPoint makes yo udumb' story
• Previous by thread: Re: wacky XML
• Next by thread: Re: wacky XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread