• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: genx - consensus items
• From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
• Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 22:22:52 +0400 (AMT)
• In-reply-to: <B702227A-4DD0-11D8-B206-000A95A51C9E@t...>

> In genx, the only significant string comparison is checking for dupe 
> attributes (I think; haven't written the code yet).  Since you only 
> check each one once, the cost of doing an intern() (what I assume you 
> mean by atomize) is probably higher than just doing the string 
> comparison. -Tim

Tim,

In case you occasionally decide to add a check for name match for closing elements,
it is p!=q && strcmp(p,q); that is, if the application supplies the same string,
it can be compared as pointer. Let C atomize strings for the programmer.

David

• References:
  • Re: genx - consensus items
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: genx - consensus items
• Next by Date: RE: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Previous by thread: Re: genx - consensus items
• Next by thread: Re: genx - consensus items
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread