• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: genx - consensus items
• From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
• Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 10:15:06 +0400 (AMT)

Rich Salz:
> > I'm inclined to agree.  A teeny bit more complexity in the
> > implementation but probably worth it.  Anyone want to push back? -Tim
> 
> asymnmetry is bad.  open-close, begin-end, etc.

The idea was to improve asymmetry, not to defeat it, I think.

startTag
  attribute*
  text
endTag

But in this case startTag is not start 'Tag', it is startElement/endElement.

Not that I like this approach, just explaining. Simple logic is better than
complex.

David

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: genx - consensus items
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: genx - consensus items
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• Prev by Date: JAXB Reference Implementation Bug ?
• Next by Date: Re: genx - consensus items
• Previous by thread: RE: genx - consensus items
• Next by thread: Re: genx - consensus items
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread