• To: "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>,"xml-dev mailing list" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: genx - consensus items
• From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:49:16 -0500
• References: <0806139A-4C8A-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@t...> <400F55C8.7050308@c...> <CED77AC8-4C98-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@t...>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>


> On Jan 21, 2004, at 8:47 PM, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
> 
> >> Requests for enhancement that I am just *not* going to do unless we 
> >> get some really new information:
> >> 2. Optional escaping of illegal characters
> >
> > Do you mean that illegal characters will NEVER be escaped or that they 
> > will ALWAYS be escaped?
> 
> If there are illegal characters that's an error. -Tim

If my input contains things like '<' it would be convenient
if the XML writer would escape this to '&lt;' for me
instead of throwing an error. Would save me some work.

Or what do you mean with illegal character?

Karl

• References:
  • genx - consensus items
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: genx - consensus items
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: genx - consensus items
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: genx - consensus items
• Next by Date: Re: XLink and mixed vocabulary design
• Previous by thread: Re: genx - consensus items
• Next by thread: Re: genx - consensus items
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread