• To: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: Re: Genx
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:48:59 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev mailing list <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <400EF09E.1040106@d...>
• References: <20040121195737.GH30165@s...> <C85FBC6B-4B14-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@t...> <200401211840.i0LIeLo07627@d...> <200401212120.i0LLKMo09364@d...> <400EF09E.1040106@d...>

On Jan 21, 2004, at 1:35 PM, Rich Salz wrote:

> Why not just do everything in UTF-8.  All this wchar_t, "asdfasdf"L 
> support, etc., is going to complicate the API.  Seems simpler to have 
> the basic API, and for those not working in UTF-8 (or its subset:), 
> they only have to remember a single consistent rule:  call "convert()" 
> first.

Now that's an attractive idea.  I'd still probably retain the

genxCharacter(genxWriter * w, int character)

because I've seen all sorts of situations where you know what the U+ 
value is and just want to stuff that character into the stream.  -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Genx
    • From: jcowan@r...

• References:
  • Re: Genx
    • From: jcowan@r...
  • Genx
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Genx
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: Genx
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: Genx
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Genx
• Next by Date: ANNOUNCE: RDF Gateway 2.0 released with free personal edition
• Previous by thread: Re: Genx
• Next by thread: Re: Genx
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread