• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:51:08 -0500
• In-reply-to: <008a01c3deaa$18e89c50$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>

lists@j... (Jeff Rafter) writes:
>Does anyone know the current deployment/penetration level of RDDL? I
>know that I am using it for all of my major projects-- basically
>whenever anything goes public it has an RDDL document at the end of
>the namespace. I ask because I am curious what the cost is to upgrade.
>Additionally there was a lot of talk in the beginning about SAX
>Filters and the like that could try to automate RDDL lookups-- are any
>of those still out there?

I think it's just a few of us.  I used RDDL a lot for a while during a
burst of writing processing rule vocabularies:

http://simonstl.com/ns/fragments/
http://simonstl.com/ns/namespaces/
http://simonstl.com/ns/gorille/

I find them useful, but mostly I've found other things (mostly HTML docs
or schemas) at the end of the namespace URI.

• References:
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Next by Date: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Previous by thread: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread