Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Simon St.Laurent wrote: > rob@k... (Robert Koberg) writes: > >>The post (which I looked for at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ >>that only shows post up to 2003-12 -- thanks Simon) that cocked my >>trigger was: >> >>http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200401/msg00115.html >> >>just a little too hard to stomach. > > > Funny. That's the post where I concluded that a gratuitous argument > about a particular site had turned into a conversation worth following. > > It's tough when Elliotte's that completely right, but it happens pretty > regularly. Usually when I'm on the other side, unfortunately. > Aww geez... I am feeling like an ass (though I don't think my complaint was wrong). I usually agree with him because when I tried to learn something about XML I searched and found something by elharo that answered my question. I even contacted him to review my code, but did not want to agree to his changes to our NDA... It was simply the fact that he perscribed a certain *way* which turned out to be untested (and still really is). aaarrggghhh, -Rob
|
