• To: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Genx c14n?
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:34:52 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...,David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
• In-reply-to: <40157957.90606@d...>
• References: <200401262015.i0QKFRMe040000@a...> <40157957.90606@d...>

On Jan 26, 2004, at 12:32 PM, Rich Salz wrote:

>> The world needs     - the commented form of Canonical XML
>
> And the ability to add exc-c14n without too much difficulty, please.

Having read the exc-c14n draft, I couldn't figure out how this would 
affect the behavior of genx. -Tim

smime.p7s

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Genx c14n?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Genx c14n?
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
  • Re: Re: Genx c14n?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Genx c14n?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Genx c14n?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Genx c14n?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Genx c14n?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread