Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit: > At 2:54 PM -0500 1/23/04, jcowan@r... wrote: > > Hmm, did you really mean to send this to the xml-dev list? Nope, a slip of the brain. > >2.14: Using parse="text" and an xpointer should mean that whatever > >the xpointer > >points to is converted to text and included as such. > > Regardless, I will comment on point 2.14. This is very tricky because > the XPointer will typically be resolved through an API such as DOM, > JDOM, SAX, or XOM that does not provide full access to the original > text content. You make a very good point. Of course 2.14 was yours in the first place. > (Hmm, is > there a fragment identifier type defined for text/plain?) There is not, though Erik Wilde has an Internet-Draft proposing one. Furthermore, there is no fragid type defined for text/xml or application/xml, either. -- Long-short-short, long-short-short / Dactyls in dimeter, Verse form with choriambs / (Masculine rhyme): jcowan@r... One sentence (two stanzas) / Hexasyllabically http://www.reutershealth.com Challenges poets who / Don't have the time. --robison who's at texas dot net
|
