• To: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>
• Subject: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:36:29 -0800
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <008a01c3deaa$18e89c50$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>
• References: <0494A708-49EF-11D8-B62D-000A95BA5A2C@o...> <1074458181.24853.364.camel@delleric> <8CDD5CB2-4A08-11D8-81B2-000A95BA5A2C@o...> <p06010206bc31a291caf6@[192.168.254.4]> <008a01c3deaa$18e89c50$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>

On Jan 19, 2004, at 8:34 AM, Jeff Rafter wrote:

> Does anyone know the current deployment/penetration level of RDDL?

JeanPa tells me that they're going to be (maybe already are) using it 
for the Microsoft Office XML namespace names (those that aren't (grr) 
URNs that is).  -Tim

• References:
  • RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: RDDL2 background
• Next by Date: Re: XML Training
• Previous by thread: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread