• To: 'xml-dev@l... ' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:07:12 -0800
• In-reply-to: <r02000200-1028-080E92FC43C711D8B1470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <r02000200-1028-080E92FC43C711D8B1470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

On Jan 10, 2004, at 3:45 PM, Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> RFC 2396 is a remarkable document.  Holy writ and hellish mess all
> wrapped into one package.  Separating the two is difficult, both in
> theory and in practice.

You might want to check out the rewrite-in-progress at 
http://www.apache.org/~fielding/uri/rev-2002/rfc2396bis.html which most 
people seem to think is a substantial step forward. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: wacky XML
• Next by Date: Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• Previous by thread: RE: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• Next by thread: Re: Why is xml:base a URI *reference*?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread