[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Jan 25, 2004, at 12:29 PM, Henrik Martensson wrote: >> I have no qualms about exposing URLs. People are familiar with URLs, >> and the notion of pointing to something using a URL is >> well-understood. > > Agreed. (And thank you for writing "URL" and not "URI".) Well, there's nothing wrong with using URL as long as you are clear exactly what you mean. This is made a bit more difficult by the fact that there's no normative definition which is still in effect, last time I checked. I believe that what you mean is something like "HTTP-scheme URIs which are normally dereferenceable unless something's wrong." But since there is room for confusion, you should probably say so explicitly. -Tim
|

Cart



