• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: ANN: Regular Associations
• From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 01:44:16 -0500
• In-reply-to: <200401040632.i046WPYR005745@a...>
• References: <3FF78341.9010403@o...> <200401040632.i046WPYR005745@a...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 10:32:25AM +0400, David Tolpin wrote:
> I am proposing to validate it against a very small schema.
[...]
> In the worst case, that is, with the current implementation, it takes 1 second
> of processor time to determine the type of a 5 megabytes XML file that fails
> to match three RNG pattern productions.

And if I give you a 20 gigabyte stream?
*not* parsing is always faster than parsing...

Best,

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ANN: Regular Associations
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• References:
  • Re: ANN: Regular Associations
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
  • Re: ANN: Regular Associations
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: Regular Associations
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: Regular Associations
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: Regular Associations
• Next by thread: Re: ANN: Regular Associations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread