• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Why XML Schema is so large
• From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@v...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:53:25 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200312220922.hBM9MmYj070723@a...>

> What does 'a technology is complex' mean?

I guess this relates to the number of discrete moving parts. XML Schema is
full of little cogs, but XSLT layers on other abstractions more, black
boxes. If you were to decompose each down to their atomic parts (probably a
horrid tangle of FOL) they'd probably fill similar-sized bags...

Cheers,
Danny.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Why XML Schema is so large
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Why XML Schema is so large
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why XML Schema is so large
• Next by Date: RE: Why XML Schema is so large
• Previous by thread: Re: Why XML Schema is so large
• Next by thread: RE: Why XML Schema is so large
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread