[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Dean Snyder wrote: > My question is why not just use empty tags for everything? And if that > works why have non-empty tags at all? (I'm aware of the argument for XML > parsing simplicity.) > > One of my main concerns is data archivability and recoverability, even > data fragment recoverability. For these reasons I want metadata that is > human readable, inline, and practically self-documenting. Elements vs. attribute discussions have been going on for a very long time. You might want to look at this URL for some insight: http://xml.coverpages.org/elementsAndAttrs.html Using only empty elements doesn't work well for manuscripts or documents because documents have mixed content. Good luck! Betty -- /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Betty Harvey | Phone: 410-787-9200 FAX: 9830 Electronic Commerce Connection, Inc. | Glen Burnie, MD | harvey@e... | Washington,DC XML Users Grp URL: http://www.eccnet.com | http://www.eccnet.com/xmlug /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\\/\/
|

Cart



