• To: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>
• Subject: Re: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with dataheads?
• From: Berend de Boer <berend@x...>
• Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 07:24:44 +1300
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EBE52F44@l...> (BobDuCharme's message of "Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:49:59 -0500")
• References: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EBE52F44@l...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (windows-nt)

>>>>> "DuCharme," == DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) <bob.ducharme@l...> writes:

    DuCharme,> I saw someone (don't remember who) make the
    DuCharme,> generalization recently that RELAX NG is gaining in
    DuCharme,> popularity with people doing XML work with irregularly
    DuCharme,> structured documents that would end up being published
    DuCharme,> in some medium or other (the "doc heads"), and that W3C
    DuCharme,> Schemas are more entrenched with the XML developers
    DuCharme,> doing systems involved in more transactional processes
    DuCharme,> such as web services and database interaction ("data
    DuCharme,> heads"). Does anyone strongly agree or disagree with
    DuCharme,> this?

strongly disagree. I use it for everything.

-- 
Regards,

Berend. (-:

• References:
  • RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
    • From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
• Next by Date: RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
• Previous by thread: Re: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
• Next by thread: Re: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread