• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: patterns and restrictions
• From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
• Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 20:51:28 +0400 (AMT)
• In-reply-to: <200312241643.hBOGh7Hh093559@a...>

> - Is NaN equal to itself? Is NaN less than +INF and greater than -INF? If
> +INF and -INF are exclusive restrictions, do they fall within the range of their own?

I have just found answers to a part of this question in the errata. At the same 
time, I've discovered that to of implementations of XML Schema datatypes fail
to exclude NaN from the range of [-INF .. INF]. An, I'm sorry, +INF is wrong. INF is right.
Two legs better.

David

• References:
  • Re: patterns and restrictions
    • From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: patterns and restrictions
• Next by Date: Call for Papers: DATAX Workshop 2004
• Previous by thread: Re: patterns and restrictions
• Next by thread: Another mutated variant of the 'PowerPoint makes you dumb' story
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread